Wednesday, March 6, 2013

Mousavi's Note Regarding the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1929

Mousavi's Note Regarding the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1929
Wednesday, July 7, 2010 at 7:07am


Summary: We must all realize that the intent behind sanctions is not to bring the government to its knees. If we look back at the experience of August 19th, 1953 and the bitter fate of Iraq and Afghanistan in contemporary history, it should serve as a clear warning that some governments see their own survival in the continuation of this crisis, in intensified hostilities and even go as far as encouraging the use of a military offensive. It is up to the Green movement to create reconciliation by remaining true to its principles while confronting this clear risk. Resistance to potential foreign threats and invasion is a necessity and amongst other areas, should be an area of focus for the Green movement.


Translated by Negar Irani

Mir Hossein Mousavi, Prime Minister for 8 years during the time of sacred defense of our country, responds to the Security Council Resolution 1929 against our nation, providing solutions for facing the consequences that lie ahead for Iran as a result of these sanctions. According to Kalame, the main content of this statement is as follows:

Unfortunately, the Security Council's resolution 1929 was finally passed. This resolution and other resolutions could have easily been avoided had we used some tact and wisdom. If we are discussing this resolution today, it is not to pour further salt on a wound, rather because ignoring the consequences of this resolution will only make matters worse. Even if we state that this resolution is a pretext, it does not minimize the effects of tumultuous and manipulative policies. Of course swearing at and insulting other countries may have an effect on a small domestic audience with limited awareness, however, in reality it does nothing but further deteriorate the situation outside our borders. Unfortunately, unlike certain politicians in our country who put their own personal interests above that of our country's national interests, we doubt that the authorities of the countries imposing sanctions on us define their own interests outside the framework of their country's national interests. I am hopeful that our nation paid close attention to the vulgar response given by Russia's Foreign Minister to one of the speakers. In his response he pointed to a fact that has been repeatedly witnessed in international relations, mainly that for Russia (and other countries, such as the United States, China, Turkey, Brazil and others) the most important criteria is protecting Russia's national interests - although understanding this simple point seems to be difficult for those [in our country] who are unfortunately too wrapped up in their own short term interests to even notice it. To me, however, it abundantly clear that this resolution is going to have an adverse effect on our country's security and economy. It will lead to a reduction in our GDP, higher unemployment, more economic and social pressures on our people, result in a widening of the gap between the development of our country vis-a vis our neighboring countries and in effect serve as the last nail in the coffin that was being prepared over the past twenty years. Anyone with any common sense will know that the passing of this resolution will only lead to the further isolation and vulnerability of our country.

The fate of other countries in the region that have proudly fallen for the empty rhetoric of such short sited nations is a pitiful fate that we should all be conscious of.

Currently, it is important to focus on solutions that will minimize the threats to our independence, territorial integrity and the legitimate rights of our country. It goes without saying that safeguarding our freedom, the rights of our citizens and defending our national security will not be possible without the free and informed consent of our citizens. Green social networks must focus on solutions designed to safeguard us from this undesirable event. Before pointing out some of these possible solutions, it is important that we condemn this cruel and unnecessary resolution. We are being condemned while Palestinian land is still easily occupied by others who are given the right to nuclear bombs, while we are deprived of the right to use nuclear technology for peaceful purposes. Surely this resolution is against our country. We must nevertheless also keep our eyes open to the effects of other existing, yet chaotic and adventurous policies.

The first and most essential solution to countering this resolution is to ensure that our nation is informed in an honest and forthright manner. It is our people's right to better understand the details of this resolution and the additional sanctions that are being added to it. Our people need to understand the effects of these sanctions on the unemployment rate, on inflation, on our GDP and the ability of our nation to progress. In other words, they need to understand how it effects their bottom line. Referring to this resolution as a torn piece of paper is not going to solve the problems and challenges facing our nation. If our people have to face and fight an adversity that was not of their choosing, we must at least gain their trust; a trust that will only be developed through transparency and a government that is truthful and forthright.

One of the points our people must to be made aware of, is the predictable security risks resulting from this new resolution. Many of our citizens are unaware of extent of the dangers associated with the path that we have fallen into due to ignorance and exaggeration.The witty rants and boasts by certain individuals pretending that nothing has happened is nothing but betrayal of our people. If our nation’s readiness is the most important element in fighting the potential dangers we face, then it is incumbent upon us to inform them as much as possible about the potential security consequences associated with the current situation we find ourselves in. If this is too difficult a task for those responsible for our government, they should at least allow non-government owned media outlets to freely inform our citizens of the necessary analysis with compassion and without exaggeration of the facts.

These new conditions require that we expand the current limited circle of advisers to the nuclear issue. As far as I am aware, unlike the era when Mr. Khatami was president, we currently have less people and individuals with far less experience than in the past, handling this sensitive matter. One of the main reasons why we find ourselves in this undesirable and critical position is due to this limited circle of advisers. Governments of countries that have dealt with the nuclear issue successfully, in addition to having legitimacy, observe national alliances, building upon collective and even relative consensus. What is wrong with allowing our country's parliament to make decisions with regards to the principles governing our country's nuclear policy the same way they made decisions with regards to the American hostages? Instead, our parliament is left with no recourse but to come up with last minute, dictated legislation designed to justify the incorrect decision making processes of our government. Why is it that a select few are making secretive decisions about matters that affect the future of our entire nation? Were our people not supposed to be in charge of their own destiny? Why should our people be in agreement with every decision we make? Are the principles associated with referendum meaningless in our society to the extent that every time some one refers to them they have to face a barrage of insults and threats? Should we not instead allow our people to be involved in sensitive and important decisions that effect our entire nation?

Under the current conditions, a rift between the people and the government will only result in a higher risk of danger from foreign influences and those with bad intentions. The rigged elections, the oppression that occurred after the elections, the mismanagement and corruption, the deceit and confusing economic and cultural policies have lead to a crisis and lack of confidence in the government and a distancing of the people from the ruling powers. Today, more than ever it is vital that we begin to pay attention to and address the solutions that were set forth in the Green movement's statement #17. A repressive and illegitimate government that is at war with its own people is ill equipped to effectively deal with foreign threats. Under these circumstances, they [the illegitimate ruling government] have to either pay an unfair ransom, or put the country under imminent risk. As a result, creating a safe backdrop for free, fair, competitive and non-selective elections, and ensuring freedom of press, freedom of political prisoners, taking care of the families of those martyred and harmed becomes even more vital. If our people are our main asset for dealing with the serious situation we currently face, then their opinion and viewpoint should be respected. Before making any decisions, we must carefully consider the impact of these decisions on the lives of teachers, white collar workers, laborers, salaried workers, the poor and all those working hard to make a living in our society. It is not fair to have the youth who are seeking jobs pay the price of arbitrary and adventurous decisions made by the government. Let us all bear witness to a bunch of hollering, baton carrying thugs who do nothing but threaten the lives, livelihood and dignity of our people in broad day light, and speak of bombarding our parliament in broad day light all under the pretext of pro-government support. Is this how we run the world?

Fostering hatred, creating enemies and continued factional killings have only led to the regime becoming even more empty handed. A brief look at the events that took place in New York and Geneva last year only shed more light to the weakness of this government. In order to overcome this dangerous crisis of management in our country will have to utilize every capacity at our disposal. The danger we face is significant enough that referring to important personalities such as Mr. Hashemi, Khatami, Rohani, Aghazadeh, Larijani and others is a necessity. Is it not unfortunate that our former president [Khatami, someone with wide international support and respect] would be prevented from traveling abroad, when his presence would have been instrumental in defending our nation's rights when it comes to nuclear technology? Everyone in our country is aware of the fact that most of the qualified managers and individuals who should be used as an elite force to run the country when in crisis have been excluded from all important policy making decisions. How should we view this obvious, extremely concerning and controversial reality?

The current activities of the IRGC (Sepah) are questionable to say the least. On the one hand the IRGC and Basiji forces are aiming their weapons directly at the people of our nation instead of at our enemies, playing a key role in the oppression and interrogation of political forces and those opposing the regime. On the other hand the IRGC has also become involved in our nation's economy in an unprecedented manner. Certainly, restoring the IRGC's original responsibilities will lead to reviving the honorable role of this institution as defenders of our sacred nation. It will also reduce the dangers resulting from greed and malice, enable a more healthy economy, reduce corruption and further encourage the private sector. An IRGC that is more concerned with the volatility of the dollar on the open market and interference in the affairs of banking, the stock market and export and import contracts cannot be trusted with the security of our nation and our revolution. Unfortunately we are currently witnessing the deterioration of popular support for the IRGC. If this trend continues, it is foreseeable that the IRGC will become exceedingly more interested in defending its own interest in the stocks of companies and institutions in is invested in rather than defending our nation. Eventually this interest will transform them into authoritarian power that works against the best interest of our nation. If love and trust of the armed forces is considered one of their greatest assets, today the activities of the IRGC as it relates to the economy and our security have led to the significant decrease of their social capital.

We all know that the brave and chivalrous forces within the IRGC are fed up with this type of behavior. Let us not forget the people's hatred of the financial and security institutions during the time of the monarchy and to what extent they were instrumental in the people's anger. As a result of the resolution and sanctions imposed on our country, reviewing the role of the IRGC and Basiji should be a key concern for everyone looking for the best interest of our nation, regardless of our background or affiliation. Here I would like to also reiterate that the attack of the Basiji on Mr. Karroubi and Khatami , the events that occurred on June 4th of this year and the recent attack and insult of our parliament only further facilitates the interests and goals of those who have imposed the sanctions on our country.

The last point we need to focus on is that the sanctions are not designed to bring the government to its knees. If we look back at the experience of August 19th, 1953 and the bitter fate of Iraq and Afghanistan in contemporary history, it should serve as a clear warning that some governments see their own survival in the continuation of this crisis, in intensified hostilities and even go as far as encouraging the use of a military offensive. It is up to the Green movement to create reconciliation by remaining true to its principles while confronting this clear risk. Resistance to potential foreign threats and invasion is a necessity and amongst other areas, should be an area of focus for the Green movement. We must demonstrate to our people that the way out of this crisis is to return to the principles and solutions presented by the Green movement since its inception a year ago. The Green movement should use its influence and power in the international arena to show foreign powers that it will not allow them to take advantage of the weakness and illegitimacy of the current ruling government and harm the territorial integrity and interests of our nation.

The Green movement will continue to focus on building awareness within all sectors of our society and in doing so will not allow the oppressors [ruling government] to escape from accountability and responsibility towards our nation by creating a crisis and unnecessary military conflict. We will continue to fight the systematic suppression and intimidation of opponents of this government and will not allow them [the ruling government] to focus on their own short term interests and in doing so compromise our national interests.

Mir Hossein Mousavi on Facebook
http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=406678922605

Mousavi’s Condolence Message for the Passing of Allameh Fazlollah

Mousavi’s Condolence Message for the Passing of Allameh Fazlollah
Monday, July 5, 2010 at 9:00am

Following the passing of Allameh Seyyed Mohammad Hossein Fazlollah, the leading Lebonese Shiite cleric and scholar, Mir Hossein Mousavi in a message expressed his deepest condolences for the loss of this leading spiritual leader.


The full text of Mir Hossein Mousavi’s condolence message is as follows:

In the name of God, the Compassionate and the Merciful


I express my condolences for the departure of the spiritual scholar and innovative intellectual, Ayatollah Seyyed Mohammad Hossein Fazlollah, one of the caring Marjas (senior religious figure) of the Islamic world, to the Lebanese nation and his followers and respected family.


He was a warrior figure and a noble scholar who always by relying on the abundant knowledge and conscious view without obduracy was influential in solving the problems for his nation and Muslims of the world. It is hoped that his enlightening approach and vision would be followed by committed scholars and his caring students. Today the Muslims need brave, knowledgeable and innovative scholars like him so that in today’s transforming world they can, besides the freedom-seeking intellectuals and committed scientists, open the path to the future and achieve the stature they deserve among human society.

Mir Hossein Mousavi

Mir Hossein Mousavi on Facebook
http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=406035712605

Saturday, February 2, 2013

DETAILED INTERPRETATION OF THE VOTE SENTRY COMMITTEE

DETAILED INTERPRETATION OF THE VOTE SENTRY COMMITTEE
DETAILED INTERPRETATION OF THE SENTRY COMMITTEE FOR PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE MR. MIR HOSSEIN MOUSAVI’S VOTES
With Special Thanks to Supporters
June 16, 2010 at 11:49am










































Mir Hossein Mousavi on Facebook
http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.403772154453.177747.45061919453

Mousavi’s Statement on June 12th Events and Attack on Marjas

Mousavi’s Statement on June 12th Events and Attack on Marjas
Monday, June 14, 2010 at 10:07am


Mir Hossein Mousavi in reaction to the attacks on the residences of Maraje (the highest ranking religious spiritual leaders) in a statement considered these actions the result of the need of the ruling powers to create distractions in order to hide the disasters they have caused for the country from people’s eyes. He also considered this year’s Khordaad 22nd (June 12, the anniversary of rigged presidential election) the sign of the Green movement’s maturity and wisdom. The full statement is as follows:

In the name of God

Refusing to issue permit for rally on Khordad 22nd (June 12th) more than anything showed the fear of the government from the repeat of the epic of Khordad 25, 1388 (June 14, 2009). The unprecedented array of security and armed forces in Tehran showed that even after a year of suppression, imprisonment, partisan use of the IRIB (the state-run televisions and radios), government’s media and spending billions, the totalitarians could not convince people of that they have sincerity and truth in their actions. As if they could, why would they have need for all these expenses, bringing forces, and spreading lies?

Attack on the people and students on Khordad 22nd and then attack on the residences of great Marja, Grand Ayatollah Saanei and attack on the office of late Grand Ayatollah Montazeri and insults to Hojat-al-Islam Karroubi revealed the extent of mental crisis and unrest among the attackers. On this year’s Khordaad 22nd, people didn’t give any excuse to the government to hide the outcomes of the Security Council’s resolution 1929 that was enforced on our country and nation because of bad management and populist policies and to make people forget the consequences of the double-faced and unjustified actions during the Khordaad 14 commemoration.*

Khordaad 22nd showed the maturity of the great Green movement and showed that every Green citizen wherever he or she is, at home, office, workplace, factory, school or on streets, with innovation and originality, is a movement on his or her own.

The Green movement has the wisdom to not act in a way that the totalitarians can hide the outcomes of their wrong policies in economy, culture, politics and foreign affair. Today the ruling powers need more than ever to create distractions to hide the consequences of the disasters that they have brought on the country from people’s eyes.

Attack on the office of a respected Marja and one of the beloved students of Imam [Khomeini] is a new stage of these kinds of tension creations. But those who ordered and those who executed such a dangerous act must know that attack on Marjas and insulting and putting pressure on them only destroy the legitimacy of the establishment.

Have they forgotten that it was the attack on Imam [Khomeini’s] house [by Shah’s forces] that laid the foundations to eliminate the bases of despotism on 15 June 1963 and then later on February 1979, and they still do not take lessens from these?!

Is it based on these historical experiences that you still sit on the branches and cut the roots?!

Mir Hossein Mousavi

14 June 2010

* When the government supporters insulted the grandson of Imam Khomeini and didn’t let him speak in the anniversary of his grandfather passing because of his supports for the people

Mir Hossein Mousavi on Facebook
http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=400178532605

Tuesday, January 8, 2013

Mousavi’s Message Condemning Insults on Grandson of Ayatollah Khomeini

Mousavi’s Message Condemning Insults on Grandson of Ayatollah Khomeini
Saturday, June 5, 2010 at 12:33pm


Mir Hossein Mousavi by issuing a statement while expressing his point of views regarding the events that happened at the ceremony commemorating the 21st anniversary of the passing of Ayatollah Khomeini, strongly condemned the organized insults made on Seyyed Hassan Khomeini, the grandson of Ayatollah Khomeini, during this ceremony and called it an engineered plan. Full English translation of Mir Hossein Mousavi's statement is as follows:

In the name of God

Few years ago late Ayatollah Tavasoli, the close ally of late Imam [Khomeini], dedicated his life to fight with a project that its aim was to eliminate Seyyed Hassan Khomeini (the grandson of Ayatollah Khomeini) from the political scene and removing Imam [Khomeini] from memory of the nation. The sad and shocking passing of Ayatollah Tavasoli although created a pause in this project but did not stop it.

This year the ceremony commemorating the anniversary of the passing of Imam [Khomeini] on June 4th was reduced to only one day and all the other public and official programs including the programs of June 4th and 5th nights was eliminated and even in this brief ceremony it was expected that it would be limited to only mentioning few moral characterises of Imam and nothing would be said regarding Imam’s respect for people’s vote and his view that the parliament is on top of all affairs, and again it was predictable that Imam’s concerns about the dangers of radicalism and dictatorship in the future of the revolution would be ignored and in contradiction to Imam’s humility toward the shia Imams, some would be portrayed in same the level of Imam Ali (Shia’s first Imam) and other saint Shia Imams, but those opposing violations, lies, corruptions, violating the constitution and destroying the country because of foolish policies would be portrayed as opponents.

Judging this method of comparison and falsifying the history is by knowledgeable historians, informed politicians and accomplished principalists and I only suffice to this point that the recent killings and imprisonments are the consequences of such interpretations of history, religion and principles and one should find out what would be the opinion of the senior religious figures about these kinds of interpretations given their practical results and outcomes.

This year’s ceremony, because of the recent crimes of Israel, was with the harshest anti- Zionism slogans but among these harsh slogans there was no reference to the interview of one of the Arab presidents, who is an ally of Iran, in which he recently said that the government of Iran is for their negotiations with Israel; and again it was not far from prediction that the advice of late Imam [Khomeini] to the officials of the government in the story of Mac Farlyn would be forgotten, the advice that said: “Don’t do anything that you cannot explain to the people.”

Isn’t it time to ask this question that with all these deceptive, obscure and damaging policies, who can be considered as golden opportunities for United States, Israel, MKO and the monarchists: The freedom and justice seekers who seek the glory of Islam, Iran and the Iranians through return to the constitution and eliminating corruption and lies? Or the suspicious cults that with their policies are destroying the working class, teachers, staff workers , farmers and all the oppressed classes, and despite their rhetoric and verbal attacks against East and West have handed over the Muslim markets to the foreigners?

Disruptions and insults made by few on the ceremony commemorating the anniversary of the passing of Imam [Khomeini] in front of the podium could not have happened without the previous consent and engineering. Who is not to know that always some in an organized manner and to create disruptions, such as what happened, gather in front of podiums? In the ceremony of June 4th this also happened and in front of the cameras and surprised eyes, a small group extended the usual insults this time to the grandson of Imam [Khomeini]; presumably because he never wanted to leave the people alone, [but] [they are] unaware that these kinds of engineered actions will raise more awareness on the importance of safeguarding and protecting the inheritors of Imam [Khomeini].

Seyyed Hassan Khomeini is one of the shining starts of the Seminary schools and our national scene and plans to diminish this light will not have any result but damage for their architects.

Mir Hossein Mousavi

Mir Hossein Mousavi on Facebook
http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=397742427605

Mousavi’s Interview About Ayatollah Khomeini’s Character and His Era

Mousavi’s Interview About Ayatollah Khomeini’s Character and His Era
Tuesday, June 1, 2010 at 4:06am


Iranian opposition leader, Mir Hosein Mousavi says Islamic Republic rulers have turned into violent and oppressive “jailors” of the people, denying them their legitimate liberties, Kaleme website reported today. He also condemned the parliament for its inability to hold the government responsible for its “financial violations” regarding the use of the national budget. Reportedly the government has refused to report all its financial activities to the parliament.In reference to his stance regarding Ayatollah Khomeini, the founder of the Islamic Republic, Mousavi maintained that he is faithful to the ideals set out by the late ruling cleric; however, he does not aim for a return to that time.While he admitted his great affection for Ayatollah Khomeini, he said that he also has criticisms of the time of the Leader of the Revolution. He added: “Our intention in looking back at that time does not mean that we want to return to that era but rather to remind ourselves of the roots and the main directions of the Revolution which were justice, freedom and spirituality.” Mousavi also condemned the official media for representing a “distorted” image of Ayatollah Khomeini to the public and maintained that if they continue in this manner, people will “deplore” the past more and more.

(English summary by Radio Zamaaned)

The full text of this interview is as follows:

Kaleme: We are approaching the anniversary of the departure of Imam [Khomeini.] This year the ceremonies seem different from previous years. On one side old opponents of Imam inside and outside the country try to desecrate his image and they are supported by foreign media. On the other side, there are those in State TV and the strong advocates of imprisonments that promote and image of the Imam that advocated oppression. What is your opinion on the goals that these groups seek? And what may this end with?

If the unintended collaboration of the State TV and opponents of Imam in desecration of his image is allowed to continue and is not responded to, it would end with nothing but hatred towards our past. These new images are introduced by constant meddling in the original perception of Imam and the revolution. Those who have directly experienced those years with Imam perceive and image of him that has no proximity to what is being promoted right now. The revolution won its victory with the messages of independence, freedom and the Islamic republic. It was these messages that gained the support of people. People gave Imam a unique welcome in the days of revolution on 1978. In Imam’s funeral people even came out in numbers four times more. I don’t think such crowds came out to just see and get some time off. The clips from those days clearly show the waves of emotions and opinions that people had toward Imam. Let us remember that people showed that much emotion after enduring the hardships of the war, and the early days of the revolution. If Imam’s image was even slightly close to what the State TV claims it were, then we would not have had so much people pouring the streets on his funeral, or at least we would have witnessed people being more indifferent. I think there is a lot of light to be shed on this distorted image of Imam that his mask-less opponents outside, and the authorities inside who are now turning into guards who constrain freedom.

Kaleme: There are expensive programs being organized for anniversary of Imam’s funeral. Why do you think such a course of action is taken?

Please pay attention to the fact that the system still gets a significant amount of its legitimacy from Imam and the collective memory of people from that great character. In the current context, those currently in power that have violently constrained the legitimate freedom of others and filled the prisons, and those who promote superstition and advocate a stone-age Islam, need to excessively spend from this great social asset. Instead, when one brings forth this image, one is also highlighting the differences between those times and now which puts to question the corrupt and despotic nature of policy approaches today. A right look back at the early years of the revolution shows how far we have deviated from those goals and values that we first set. Notice that by saying to pay attention to those years does, I do not mean to return to those days. The goal is to remember the roots, and the directions that we set for the revolution: justice, freedom and spirituality.

We want to use the Islamic revolution to launch [our nation] to [a bright] future. We don’t want to create a chaotic emotional environment and lose our direction to that future. We must constantly remind our younger generations that what is happening today is different that what happened during the time of Imam. I am confident, that if for the sake of assumption, the youth of today were there yesterday, they would be amongst the martyrs like Martyr Bakeri, Bagheri or Hemmat. Just as how the youth of that time were here today, they would be the leaders of the Green Movement of Hope, and would have been probably in prisons now held captive for their national and religious beliefs.

Kaleme: You talked of the early years and the initial goals of the revolution. But how can one talk of those years with environment of today that is bombarded with propaganda?

There are countless papers and books written and continues to be written on the Islamic Revolution in Iran and, and for obvious reasons too; because of revolution’s great impact on the region and throughout the world. After the revolution, not only Iran started to look very different, but also the whole region started to change. However, what we need today in the back and forth around the media and propaganda is promotion of a clear and visible image of that time and the Imam. As I said, there is a immature attempt to highlight ostensible similarities between now and Imam’s time and this must be stopped. For instance, you can discuss the theoretical perspective of Imam on parliament. You can break down his ideas to what was in religious scholarship and what was acceptable to people; and Recognition of parliament whether from the religious perspective or acceptability of it lays on the people. Parliament is composed of representatives of people, and these representatives come out of the people themselves. Accordingly, the parliament is “at the forefront of the affairs.”

But more important and more effective is to recount memories that demonstrate the means of political action at the beginning of the revolution. For example I was talking to Mr Karoubi about election process during Imam’s era. He recited a memory that helps us get a more clear understanding of Imam Khomeini’s personality and the values that were dominant in society at the time. In the third parliamentary election two candidates, a poor, hardworking intellectual teacher and a person with ties to Imam Khomeini’s family , were running in the region of Khomein . Although a person close to Imam Khomeini was supporting the second candidate people chose the first one. The person who was a relative of Imam sent a letter to him questioning the results. Imam replied laughing , “ what is a better indication of a fair election that a person related to me , who also enjoys the support of yourself , runs for election but people chose a simple teacher who does not have such supporters “.

Is n’t this one of the beauties of election that we should be grateful for?. Compare this with the case that occured during the sixth parliamentary election in Tehran [region] were 700 ballots were cancelled to replace an intellectual [1] who enjoyed no [state] support with an individual with relations [to high establishment officials] [2]. Or the implementation of “approbation supervision” that did not exist during Imam’s time which was in reality a mean of dividing the election in two stages. If you pay attention carefully you will see how this term that has no root in the constitution or public wisdom has been [mis]used to disqualify a large number of valuable and caring individuals. The result has been to undermine the status and role of the parliament.

I ask all the conservative members of the parliament, who have not stained they faith with tyranny, does n’t thinking about all these humiliation directed toward parliament make you feel worried and empty? Is the current situation you are in fitting to the meaning of this sentence “The Parliament leads all affairs”? [3] You have been incapable of scrutinizing even a small portion of the government financial irregularities and receive a proper response. What answer would you give God and his servants whom you represent? Does the current situation in the parliament has any resemblance to parliaments during the time of Imam Khomeini ?

One issue that can provide a better understanding of Imam Khomeini and also demonstrate differences between the current situation [and that time] is discussing the chain of events that lead to introduction of 8 point order by Imam Khomeini. This document without any changes can show the tragedy of the current situation including arrests and tyranny. The youth should look at this document to know where we were headed then and to which direction we are going now. Some people in this country are destroying everything including Imam’s image and the first 10 years of revolution. This was a project that was started in the 10th presidential election. As I said a proper introduction of Imam Khomeini and a fair introduction of the revolution will expose and scathe the politics of oppression and superstition.

Kaleme: You are known as the prime minister of Imam Khomeni. In your speeches, statements and interviews you always speak about the bright era in the first decade of the revolution and Imam’s path. In general and in the political sphere of Iran [in particular] , have different dimensions of Imam’s personality been exaggerated ?

Dr. Shariatie one said “ Peak of the Damavand[4] does not need a proof that it is the tallest” . Imam was an extraordinary person. He brought an irreversible change in our history , and ended the monarchy , a system that prided itself in humiliation of peasants in face of their kings. Some images from the epoch of Shah could mislead our youth. But [they ] should be reminded that one of the posters published repeatedly in newspapers of the time showed a poor peasant kissing Shah’s shoes.

In response to your question I should reiterate that Imam was an extraordinary man. But he did not perceive himself as such. He despised praise and eulogy. Once he banned national TV from showing his picture and said “ Whenever I open TV , I see myself , it make me want to puke”. He had the same ban for newspapers for a period. People who have experienced that era remember that when the top elected member of parliament from tehran praised him [in public] he ferociously interrupted him. This was while the MP was not expecting any gain from the praise. Similar case occurred for the head of the expediency council who was also Imam Khomeini’s student. When he lauded Imam Khomeini in public, Imam rejected his words publicly. It is not strange if we see him as a symbol of a new system that is progressive, seeks freedom and demands justice. Without his charisma and his relationship with people our nation would not have resisted for 8 years of war. Without our nation’s believe in him , we would not have survived numerous terrorist attacks during that era.

Kaleme: In any case , some members of green movement raise a question as why you repeatedly speak about Imam Khomeini or use his picture?

I referred to the necessity of introducing Imam Khomeini to the youth. But I should also discuss another point ,which I have no doubt all supporters of green movement agree on , and that is integrity. I cannot pretend against my attachment to and admiration for Imam Khomeini and revolution. Since the formation of green path of hope I clearly introduced myself as companion of green movement so I can discuss my beliefs transparently. A characteristic of this movement is transparent and honest discussion of thoughts and ideas. Exchange of ideas does not harm us. We should remember that one of the best posters regarding the movement was the one that read “lying is disallowed”. What kind of expectation requires me to ignore a ten year period full of experiences and various events. Not only me but a large number of our people have thousands of memories from Imam Khomeini. They have been influenced by that era and are not willing to keep quiet in the face of injustice and distortion toward Imam’s character. Is it correct to ignore this great political capital? Is not this what the prison guards want us to do?

Kaleme: You introduced yourself as a member of the green movement, and talked about your devotion, and love for the Imam and the revolution. You talked about how it is necessary to protect the spiritual asset that is the experiences during the Imam era. But haven’t these talks stopped you from critically viewing those times? Don’t you think that there are problems with those times as well?

I have heard this issue before, specially after the speech of Tehran’s Attorney General. There is also a letter published on one of these websites addressing this very issue. As a Shiite Muslim one of our beliefs is that after the 14 innocent ones, all the rest of God’s people are not innocent and the commit sins, unless God keeps the innocent. The same reasoning applies to Imam’s era. However, I don’t see it necessary to criticize when internal and external enemies have aimed for the Imam’s image and that era. Obviously, in the context of today, even a slight allusion to a problem would be greatly magnified just like the plot that was the tearing the picture of Imam, that was abused by enemies outside and inside the country.Today, the enemies of the green movement are looking everywhere for a prey, or an excuse to destroy that bond that connects us together. Millions in our country like and appreciate Imam, and I am one of the. Recognition of this affinity [to Imam] and the freedom that brings about is a great asset that we cannot make a mistake about specially in the current conditions. Let me repeat again, we do not expect a companion [of the movement] to lie, no matter how small a member that person is.

[1] Alireza Rajaie
[2] Gholam Ali Haddad Adel, father in law of Ayatollah Khamenei’s son Mojatabi Khamenei.
[3] A famous quote by Imam Khomeini regarding the role of parliament
[4] The highest peak of Iran located on Alborz Mountain

With special thanks to Khordaad88 for full English translation

Khordaad 88
http://khordaad88.com/?p=1623

Mir Hossein Mousavi on Facebook
http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=396572187605

Thursday, December 6, 2012

Mousavi Condemned Israel's Deadly Attack on Humanitarian Ships

Mousavi Condemned Israel's Deadly Attack on Humanitarian Ships
Tuesday, June 1, 2010 at 3:25am


Following the deadly attack by Israel in international waters on flotilla of humanitarian aid-carrying ships destined for Gaza, Mir Hossein Mousavi in a statement strongly condemned this horrendous act. The full text of this statement is as follows:

Once again in a new act of aggression, the occupying regime of Al-Quds raided the convoy of civilian flotilla ships carrying aid for the Muslim people of Gaza and unveiled its violence seeking nature. This attack that left many dead or injured, is the flagrant violation of international laws and basic human rights. I, along with the justice seeking Green Movement around the world and in a united voice with all those who seek freedom, condemn this international crime and while expressing sympathy with the oppressed people of Palestine and offering my condolences to the people of Turkey for the loss of a number of their fellow citizens, urge the international community to firmly confront the perpetrators of this inhumane act and the violators of human dignity.

Mir Hossein Mousavi

Mir Hossein Mousavi on Facebook
http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=396568452605